20 Lies Too Many People Fall For About Gun Control main image
Scroll Down To Continue

20 Lies Too Many People Fall For About Gun Control

In the heated debate over gun control, misinformation and misconceptions can make it hard to see the truth. We aim to cut through the noise by debunking widely circulated myths and providing a clearer picture of the realities behind gun legislation. From exaggerated claims about the impact of gun control on crime rates to misunderstandings about Second Amendment rights, we’ll tackle the lies you’ve been fed and offer evidence-based insights.

By addressing these myths, we hope to create a more informed and helpful dialogue on this crucial issue, helping individuals and policymakers navigate the complexities of gun control with a clearer understanding. Whether you’re a concerned citizen or an active participant in the debate, we’re here to give you the facts you need to have a better discussion about gun control.

"Gun Control Doesn't Work"

"Gun Control Doesn't Work"

Research indicates that effective gun control measures, such as background checks, assault weapon bans, and safe storage laws, can significantly reduce gun violence and mass shootings.

Countries with strict gun laws often experience lower rates of firearm-related deaths. While no single policy is completely effective, a combination of well-implemented regulations contributes to enhanced public safety and a decrease in gun-related incidents.

(Image via Adobe)

"More Guns Equals Less Crime"

"More Guns Equals Less Crime"

The United States has the most firearms per capita. If more guns meant less crime, the US would have the lowest crime rate in the world. Spoiler alert, we don’t.

The US has less than 5% of the world’s population but 46% of the world’s civilian-owned guns. We have more guns than people, and yet we continue to experience fatal mass shootings regularly and have the highest homicide-by-firearm rate in the developed world.

(Image via Adobe)

"A Slippery Slope to Gun Ban"

"A Slippery Slope to Gun Ban"

The claim that gun control is a slippery slope to a total gun ban is unfounded and oversimplifies the issue. Advocating for sensible regulations, like background checks and restrictions on certain weapons, does not mean an outright ban on firearms is on the way.

Countries like Australia and Canada successfully implement gun laws that respect individual rights while enhancing public safety. The goal is to reduce gun violence without taking away induvial rights of responsible gun owners.

(Image via Adobe)

"Criminals Get Guns Anyway"

"Criminals Get Guns Anyway"

The argument "criminals get guns anyway" disregards that effective gun control laws can still reduce overall gun violence. Yes, some criminals may obtain guns illegally. However, others will encounter roadblocks that prevent them from getting weapons.

Stricter regulations, such as background checks and safe storage requirements, make it harder for those most likely to misuse them to access firearms and lower the overall number of guns in circulation. This leads to a decrease in gun-related crime.

(Image via Adobe)

"Infringes on Second Amendment Rights"

"Infringes on Second Amendment Rights"

The claim that gun control "infringes on Second Amendment rights" is a misunderstanding of the amendment's intent. The Second Amendment guarantees the right to bear arms, but it does not prohibit reasonable regulations that promote public safety.

Courts have upheld that laws such as background checks and restrictions on certain types of firearms are constitutional. Gun control measures aim to balance individual rights with the need to protect communities from gun violence, ensuring responsible ownership without eliminating rights.

(Image via Adobe)

"Mental Illness is the Main Cause"

"Mental Illness is the Main Cause"

Claiming that mental illness is the main cause of gun violence is misleading and dangerous. While mental health issues can contribute to violence in some cases, they account for only a small percentage of gun-related incidents.

This blames individuals with mental illnesses, suggesting they are all violent. Focusing solely on mental illness distracts from the broader issues, such as access to firearms, socio-economic factors, and the culture of gun violence, which must be addressed to create real change.

(Image via Adobe)

"Targets Law-Abiding Citizens"

"Targets Law-Abiding Citizens"

Most gun control measures aim to prevent dangerous individuals from accessing firearms, enhancing public safety without punishing responsible gun owners. The goal is a balanced approach to gun safety.

Regulations like background checks and safe storage laws are designed to protect communities while still allowing law-abiding citizens to exercise their rights. These measures recognize that most gun owners are responsible and committed to safe practices.

(Image via Adobe)

"All Gun Owners are Extremists"

"All Gun Owners are Extremists"

The claim that "all gun owners are extremists" is a gross misrepresentation. Most gun owners are responsible, law-abiding citizens who support reasonable gun safety measures. They use firearms for hunting, sport, and self-defense, not to push extremist agendas.

This stereotype unfairly labels millions of people and gets in the way of helpful talks about gun control. We must recognize the diversity among gun owners so we can work together to create laws that keep everyone safe while also respecting people's rights.

(Image via Adobe)

"Self-Defense is the Only Reason"

"Self-Defense is the Only Reason"

Some claim that gun control means self-defense can be the only reason to own a firearm. This is misleading. Gun control measures still allow for diverse reasons to own guns, such as hunting, sport shooting, and collecting.

Responsible gun ownership encompasses many activities, and regulations do not eliminate those rights. Instead, they aim to create a safer environment for all, balancing individual rights with community safety.

(Image via Adobe)

"A Liberal Conspiracy"

"A Liberal Conspiracy"

The notion of a "liberal conspiracy" surrounding gun control is a baseless claim often used to polarize the debate. Gun control advocacy is driven by a broad, bipartisan desire to reduce gun violence and protect public safety, not by a secretive political agenda.

Framing it as a conspiracy ignores the real concerns of millions of Americans who support common-sense regulations. It's not about taking away rights but about implementing responsible measures to save lives and create safer communities for everyone.

(Image via Adobe)

"Guns Don't Take Lives, People Do"

"Guns Don't Take Lives, People Do"

The argument "guns don't take lives; people take lives" overlooks the fact that guns significantly increase the chances of violent acts resulting in death. Evidence shows that in areas with more guns, gun-related deaths are more frequent.

While individuals are responsible for violence, the availability of firearms makes it easier to cause harm and results in higher death rates from incidents like domestic violence and suicides. The statement also overlooks unintentional shootings.

(Image via Adobe)

"No One Will Obey Gun Laws"

"No One Will Obey Gun Laws"

Saying "no one will obey gun laws" overlooks the fact that laws work to discourage illegal behavior and establish consequences for violations. Just as with laws against theft or drunk driving, most people follow the law, and those who don't face penalties.

Studies show that states with stronger gun laws have lower rates of gun deaths, indicating that effective regulations do reduce gun violence. Gun laws aren't about absolute compliance but about creating safer communities.

(Image via Adobe)

"Band-Aid Solution"

"Band-Aid Solution"

The term "band-aid solution" means a temporary fix that addresses only the symptoms of a problem rather than causes. Opposers of gun control will call it a “band-aid solution” that doesn’t address the root causes of gun violence such as mental health.

The reality is that gun control should be part of a larger system working toward these root causes. While no single policy can eliminate gun violence, measures (background checks, etc.) contribute to long-term safety and preventable deaths, making them far more than just a temporary fix.

(Image via Adobe)

"Mass Confiscations Will Occur"

"Mass Confiscations Will Occur"

The claim that gun control will lead to "mass confiscations of firearms" is a myth often used to cause fear. In reality, most proposed gun control measures focus on common-sense regulations without infringing on the rights of law-abiding gun owners.

The goal is to enhance public safety, not to confiscate firearms. In countries with strict gun laws, responsible ownership is still allowed, debunking the notion of mass confiscations. No one is coming to take legally obtained and owned weapons.

(Image via Adobe)

"NRA Owns Congress"

"NRA Owns Congress"

The idea that the NRA or other pro-gun groups "own Congress" is an oversimplification. While these organizations have significant influence through lobbying and campaign contributions, it's inaccurate to suggest they control Congress.

Elected officials still answer to their constituents, and public opinion increasingly favors stronger gun control measures. While the NRA's lobbying efforts can shape legislation, the growing demand for gun safety reforms shows that no single group has total control over lawmakers.

(Image via Adobe)

"Gun Control Doesn't Affect Suicide"

"Gun Control Doesn't Affect Suicide"

Research shows that restricting access to firearms can significantly reduce suicide rates. Guns are highly lethal, and their availability increases the likelihood of a successful suicide attempt.

Countries and regions with stricter gun control laws often see lower suicide rates. Implementing measures like waiting periods and safe storage can help prevent impulsive decisions and reduce the number of gun-related suicides.

(Image via Adobe)

"Gun Control Would Solve Domestic Violence"

"Gun Control Would Solve Domestic Violence"

One action canot solve domestic violence. While gun control can reduce how often domestic violence results in death, it alone cannot address the root causes of domestic abuse.

Effective solutions require a multifaceted approach, including support services for victims, legal protections, and education to prevent violence. Gun control must be combined with broader measures to effectively tackle and reduce domestic violence.

(Image via Adobe)

"Background Checks Don't Work"

"Background Checks Don't Work"

Evidence shows that comprehensive background checks prevent individuals with criminal records or mental health issues from obtaining firearms. Studies have found that states with stricter background checks have lower rates of gun-related deaths.

While no system is perfect, background checks significantly reduce the likelihood of guns falling into the wrong hands, making them a crucial tool in promoting public safety.

(Image via Adobe)

"Targets Hunters and Sportsmen"

"Targets Hunters and Sportsmen"

Gun control does not target individuals who obtain guns legally for recreational purposes. Sensible gun control measures focus on preventing firearms from falling into the hands of criminals and individuals who pose a threat to public safety, not law-abiding hunters and sportsmen.

Regulations like background checks, safe storage laws, and restrictions on high-capacity magazines don't impede responsible gun ownership for recreational purposes but help reduce gun violence, benefiting everyone, including hunters and sportsmen.

(Image via Adobe)

"Australia's Gun Buyback Eliminated Gun Violence"

"Australia's Gun Buyback Eliminated Gun Violence"

Australia's gun buyback program, implemented after the 1996 Port Arthur massacre, did not eliminate gun violence. But it did significantly reduce gun-related deaths. The program led to the destruction of over 650,000 firearms and stricter gun laws.

The result was a substantial decline in mass shootings and gun homicides. However, gun violence still exists at a much lower rate. The success lies in dramatically reducing the frequency and severity of gun-related incidents, not in total elimination.

(Image via Adobe)